Source file: docs/models/hammer-strength-plate-loaded-linear-leg-press.md · rendered from the repository

Hammer Strength Plate Loaded Linear Leg Press (HSLLP)

Status: Computed – numeric estimate available
Confidence of outputs: estimated · method: mechanical-model · built: 2026-10-17

Mechanism: incline sled model (starting resistance + plates × sine of the sled angle, plus rail friction)

Original diagram

Model

F = SR + P·sin(θ) ± μ·(SR·cot θ + P·cos θ)

Inputs

Symbol Input Value Status Uncertainty Source (verbatim quote)
θ Rail angle to horizontal
Note: We assume "45-degree angle" is the sled travel direction vs. horizontal.
How to measure: Phone inclinometer laid on a guide rod, 3 readings.
45 deg ✅ sourced ± 1 — ASSUMPTION (not sourced): ±1° covers rounding of the stated "45-degree" and build tolerance; replace with Maxime's inclinometer reading manufacturer_page: “Featuring a 45-degree angle, this machine provides a smooth, stable press” · retrieved 2026-10-17
SR Starting resistance (empty sled, at the footplate)
Note: 118 lb = 53.52 kg; the page rounds to 53 kg. Life Fitness AU page says "118 lbs (53 kg) per arm" for the same single-sled machine. We assume SR is the along-rail force with no plates.
How to measure: Crane scale + ratchet strap in series, sled empty (protocol §4).
53.52 kg ✅ sourced ± 0.227 — rounding of the stated integer "118 lbs" (±0.5 lb) manufacturer_page: “118 lbs (53 kg)” — Spec table row "Starting Resistance" · retrieved 2026-10-17
μ Rolling friction coefficient of the sled bearings
Note: Friction raises the force while pushing up (concentric) and lowers it while lowering (eccentric). Static value lies in between.
— ✅ sourced [0.001 … 0.01] — THK table 4: linear bushing (0.001) up to LM roller (0.01). Hammer only says "linear guide rods, equipped with sealed ball bearings" – exact bearing type unknown; seal drag not included. engineering_reference: “Linear bushing LM, LMK, LMF, SC 0.001 to 0.003 … LM roller LR, LRA 0.005 to 0.01” · retrieved 2026-10-17
P Plate mass added (label value)
Note: Plate labels are taken at face value; real plate mass tolerance is not modelled.
— ⚙️ user setting — —

⚠️ Explicit assumptions (not sourced): uncertainty band of θ. They widen the error band; they do not move the nominal value.

Resulting handle-force curve

Same value at start, mid and end of the ROM (no cam/lever in this model). kgf = kilogram-force.

Plates added (kg) Nominal (static, kgf) Low (lowering) High (lifting)
0 53.5 52.7 54.3
20 67.7 66.5 68.8
40 81.8 80.2 83.3
60 96.0 94.0 97.8
80 110.1 107.7 112.4
100 124.2 121.5 126.9
120 138.4 135.2 141.4
140 152.5 149.0 155.9
160 166.7 162.7 170.5
180 180.8 176.5 185.0
200 194.9 190.2 199.5
250 230.3 224.6 235.8
300 265.7 259.0 272.2
400 336.4 327.7 344.8
500 407.1 396.5 417.4
600 477.8 465.2 490.0
700 548.5 534.0 562.7
800 619.2 602.7 635.3

Error band = worst case over every input band (corner enumeration), friction applied against the motion.

Not modelled (known unknowns)

Validation by Maxime

Follow docs/protocole-mesure-fr.md. Then compare force-gauge readings with the table above: a reading outside the band means the model (or a source) is wrong.